Abridged from Cancer Research 57, 3629-3634, September 1, 1997.
PSMA has been shown to have peptidase (12) and folate hydrolase (13) activity. While sharing some homology with rat brain NAALADase (12) and the transferrin receptor (9), PSMA does not share the latterís internalization signal (9). The function of PSMA, with respect to prostate cancer and vascular endothelial cell biology, and the direct correlation between its expression and increasing PCa aggressiveness, remains intruiging and unclear.
Until recently, the only available mAb to PSMA was
7E11.C5 (14) which targets an epitope located within the short cytoplasmic
tail of the molecule (15,16). As a result, 7E11 did not bind viable cells
(11,14,16). We recently reported development of 4 IgG mAbs reacting with
the external domain and defining 2 distinct epitopes of PSMA (PSMAext1
& ext2; (11). As these mAbs are capable of binding viable
PSMA-expressing cells, we have begun to utilize them in an effort to further
understand the function of PSMA.

Endosomal
localization of internalized antibodies:
label
proteins exposed on the surface at 4oC. Return of surface biotinylated
cells to 37oC allows the internalization of appropriate cell
surface proteins with their biotin tag. The NHS-SS-biotin label is removed
from non-internalized cell surface proteins through cleavage of the disulphide
linkage with glutathione (18), whereas internalized biotinylated proteins
are protected from this cleavage. Appearance of biotin labeled protein
that is resistant to glutathione reduction was taken as an indicator of
internalization. As shown in Fig. 4A, biotinylated PSMA is sensitive to
glutathione reduction after labeling cells at 4oC (compare Lanes
1 and 2 in panel A). However, with progressively longer incubation periods
at 37oC, an increasing proportion of the labeled PSMA becomes
increasingly resistant to reduction (Lanes 3-6, panel A). Quantitation
of the blots revealed that 60% of the total cell surface PSMA was internalized
(Fig. 4C) within 2 hours.
In this study we demonstrate, by a combination of microscopical and biochemical techniques, that PSMA and mAbs to PSMAext are internalized by LNCaP cells. Confocal microscopy and immunoelectron microscopy reveal that PSMA-mAb complexes are endocytosed via clathrin coated pits (Fig. 2 and 3). A quantitative cell surface biotinylation assay demonstrates that PSMA is constitutively internalized in the absence of antibody binding. At 20 min, 15% of the total biotinylated surface PSMA is internalized (Fig. 4C). The proportion of surface PSMA internalized increases to 60% at 60 min and remains fairly constant at that level through 240 min when the assay was terminated. The stability of the labeled PSMA for a period of over 6 hr (data not shown) indicates that PSMA degradation during this period is minimal. Internalization of only 60% of the total labeled surface PSMA may be explained by recycling of internalized, biotinylated PSMA back to the cell surface (unpublished data) where it would be reduced and rendered undetectable in this assay.
Constitutive internalization of PSMA may reflect recycling of a structural protein through a plasma membrane location or may be mediated by binding of a ligand. While finding that anti-PSMA antibody significantly increases the rate of internalization of PSMA is consistent with the latter, ligand-receptor type function, it does not necessarily indicate that PSMA has a transport function. In the presence of mAb to PSMAext the rate of internalization of PSMA increased up to 3-fold in a dose dependent manner, reaching a maximum rate at an antibody concentration of 1-2 g/ml (Fig. 4). A similar increase in internalization rate has been shown for epidermal growth factor and its ligand (19).
It is well established that many ligands and their transmembrane receptors are internalized via clathrin-coated pits (receptor-mediated endocytosis) (20). The formation of antigen-antibody complexes on the cell surface often results in internalization through a pathway closely resembling receptor-mediated endocytosis of peptide hormones, growth factors and other natural ligands (21). Based on our findings, we hypothesize that PSMA may have a transport function of an as yet unidentified ligand. The baseline internalization rate of PSMA may indicate that PSMA may internalize in the absence of ligand or, alternatively, that the PSMA ligand may be present in culture medium. Similarly, mAb or mAb fragments act as a surrogate ligand, inducing an increased rate of internalization. The internalization pattern seen in this study may have been influenced or modified by presence of mAb (22) and may not reflect the natural internalization pattern.
Targeting of most receptors to coated pits and their traffic through the endocytic compartment are thought to be mediated by a specific internalization motif in the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor (20). The first well characterized internalization motif of several receptors including the transferrin receptor, mannose-6-phosphate receptor, asialogylcoprotein receptor, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor and others are all tetrapeptides (Tyr-X-Arg-Phe) having an aromatic residue in the fourth position of the sequence (23). The cytoplasmic tail of PSMA lacks a sequence similar to the Tyr-X-Arg-Phe motif (9). Another signal is the di-leucine motif for which the only known requirement is the presence of two consecutive leucines or a leucine-isoleucine pair. The di-leucine motif has been shown to mediate internalization and targeting to endosomes and lysosomes (24). A di-leucine motif is present in the cytoplasmic tail of PSMA. Experiments are underway to confirm the dileucine internalization motif of PSMA. Interestingly, while PSMA is 85% homologous to a rat brain neuropeptidase (24), this homolgy is located primarily at the C-termini and declines to less than 50% homology at the N-termini. Furthermore, rat brain neuropeptidase lacks both the Tyr-X-Arg-Phe and di-leucine motifs (25) and presumably does not internalize. Therefore, the highly restricted expression of PSMA becomes increasingly prostate cancer-specific via different mechanisms. For example, normal and benign hyperplastic prostate epithelia express, at the mRNA level, predominantly the cytosolic PSM’ splice variant, without a significant membrane-expressed component whereas in PCa the membrane form predominates by 10-100-fold (26). Another form of functional specificity is demonstrated in rat brain astrocytes (25) where, although there is expression of an homologous neuropeptidase, this neuropeptidase is presumably not internalized as is PSMA in PCa cells.
The property of mAbs to PSMAext to be internalized in prostate cancer cells adds another dimension to their in vivo therapeutic potential. In addition to selective/specific binding to the prostate cancer cell surface, the mAb or fragment would be internalized into the targeted cells providing direct access to the neoplastic cell machinery. As such, this property opens up options such as the use of toxin or drug conjugates. Similarly, the juxtanuclear location of the internalized vesicles should increase the potency of mAb-alpha particle conjugates by improving the incident angle of the isotope and the target DNA.
Lastly, while mAb may function as a surrogate ligand, the question remains
as to the identity of the putative natural ligand of PSMA. Troyer et al
(16) noted a 40 Kd band which co-immunoprecipitated with PSMA and which
they identified as S-glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (SGOT). We have not
been able to demonstrate binding of SGOT to PSMA (data not shown). Further
study will be required to define the putative natural ligand, which, in
turn, may shed further light on the role of PSMA in cancer biology and
tumor angiogenesis. The natural ligand, if similarly restricted in its
tissue receptor binding profile, may substitute for mAb in a targeted therapy
approach.
1Equally contributed to this work
2Current Address: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,
University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
3 To whom requests should be addressed,
at New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, Box 23, 525 East 68th.
Street, NY, NY 10021. e-mail: nhbander@mail.med.cornell.edu
2. Lopes, D., Davis, Wendy L., Rosenstraus, M.J., Uveges, A.J. and Gilman, S.C.: Immunohistochemical and pharmacokinetic characterization of the site-specific immunoconjugate CYT-356 derived from antiprostate monoclonal antibody 7E11-C5. Cancer Res., 50: 6423-6429, 1990.
3. Israeli, R.S., Powell, C.T., Corr, J.G., Fair, W.R. and Heston, W.D.W.: Expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res., 54: 1807-1811, 1994.
4. Wright, G.L. Jr., Haley, C., Beckett, M.L. and Schellhammer, P.F.: Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in normal, benign, and malignant prostate tissues. Urol. Oncol., 1: 18-28, 1995.
5. Troyer, J.K., Beckett, M.L. and Wright, G.L., Jr.: Detection and characterization of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in tissue extracts and body fluids. Int. J. Cancer, 62: 552-558, 1995.
6. Wright, G.L, Jr., Grob, B.M., Haley, C., Grossman, K., Newhall, K., Moriarty, R.: Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy. Urology, 48:326-334, 1996.
7. Silver, D.A., Pellicer, I., Fair, W.R., Heston, W.D.W. and Cordon-Cardo, C.: Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 81-85, 1997.
8. Sokoloff, R.L., Norton, K.C., Gasior, C.L., Marker, K.M., and Grauer, L.S. Quantification of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in human tissues and subcellular fractions. Proceedings of the Am Assoc. Cancer Res., 39(abst #1811), 1998.
9. Israeli, R.S., Powell, C.T., Fair, W.R. and Heston, W.D.W.: Molecular cloning of a complementary DNA encoding a prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res., 53: 227-230, 1993.
10. Rinker-Schaeffer, C.W., Hawkins, A.L., Su, S.L., Israeli, R.S., Griffin, C.A., Isaacs, J.T. and Heston, W.D.W.: Localization and physical mapping of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSM) gene to human chromosome 11. Genomics, 30:105-108, 1995.
11. Liu, H., Moy, P., Kim, S., Xia, Y., Rajasekaran, A., Navarro, V., Knudson, B., and Bander, N.H.: Monoclonal antibodies to the extracellular domain of prostate specific membrane antigen also react with tumor endothelium. Cancer Res. 57:3629-3634, 1997.
12. Carter, R.E., Feldman, A.R. and Coyle, J.T.: Prostate-specific membrane antigen is a hydrolase with substrate and pharmacologic characteristics of a neuropeptidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 93:749-753, 1996.
13. Pinto, J.T., Suffoletto, B.P., Berzin, T.M., Qiao, C.H., Lin, S., Tong, W.P., May, F., Mukherjee, B. And Heston, W.D.W.: Prostate-specific membrane antigen: A novel folate hydrolase in human prostatic carcinoma cells. Clin. Cancer Res., 2:1445-1451, 1996.
14. Horoszewicz, J.S., Kawinski, E. and Murphy G.P.: Monoclonal antibodies to a new antigenic marker in epithelial cells and serum of prostatic cancer patients. Anticancer Res, 7: 927-936, 1987.
15. Troyer, J.K., Feng, Q., Beckett, M.L. and Wright, G.L., Jr.: Biochemical characterization and mapping of the 7E11-C5.3 epitope of the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Urol. Oncol., 1: 29-37, 1995.
16. Troyer, J.K., Beckett, M.L. and Wright, G.L., Jr.: Location of prostate-specific membrane antigen in the LNCaP prostate carcinoma cell line. Prostate, 30:232-242, 1997.
17. Rajasekaran, A.K., Hojo, M., Huima, T. And Rodriguez-Boulon, E.: Catenins and Zonula Occludens-1 form a complex during early stages in the assembly of tight junctions. J. Cell Biol., 132:451-463, 1996.
18. Bretscher, M.S., and Lutter, R.: A new method for detecting endocytosed proteins. Embo Journal, 7(13):4087-92.
19. Haigler, H.T., McKenna, J.A., Cohen, S.: Rapid stimulation of pinocytosis in human carcinoma cells A-431 by epidermal growth factor. J. Cell. Biol. 83:82-90, 1979.
20. Mujherjee, S., Ghosh, R.N., Maxfield, F.R.: Endocytosis. Physiological Reviews 77(3):759-803, 1997.
21. Pastan, I.H., Willingham, M.C.: Receptor-mediated endocytosis of hormones in cultured cells. Annual Review of Physiology 43:239-250, 1981.
22. Milhiet, P.C., Giocondi, M.-C., Crine, P., Le Grimellec, C., Roques, B.P., Garbay-Jaureguiberry, C.: Fate of a fluorescent inhibitor of endopeptiase-24.11 using enzyme-expressing MDCK cells. Modification of its cellular processing with a monoclonal antibody. Eur J Cell Biology 65:258-268, 1994.
23. Trowbridge, I.S.: Endocytosis and signals for internalization. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 3:634-641, 1991.
24. Letourneur, F., Klauser, R.D.: A novel di-leucine motif and a tyrosine-based motif independtly mediate lysosomal targeting and endocytosis of CD3 chains. Cell 69:1143-1157, 1992.
25. Luthi-Carter, R., Berger, U.V., Barczak, A.K., Enna, M., and Coyle, J.T.: Isolation and expression of a rat brain cDNA encoding glutamate carboxypeptidase II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95:3215-3220,1998.
26. Su, S.L., Huang, I-P., Fair, W.R., Powell, C.T., and Heston, W.D.W.:
Alternatively spliced variants of prostate-specific membrane antigen RNA:
ratio of expression as a potential measurement of progression. Cancer Res.
55:1441-1443,1995.
This work was supported by grants from CaP CURE, the David H. Koch Charitable Foundation, the Ronald P. and Susan E. Lynch Foundation, the Lawrence and Carol Zicklin Philanthropic Fund, the William T. Morris Foundation, the Bernice & Albert B. Cohen Philanthropic Fund through the Jewish Communal Fund, the John E. Wilson Research Fund, the Alissa Beth Bander Memorial Foundation, the Cornell Medical College Urological Oncology Research Fund and from BZL Biologics, Inc. NHB is a consultant to BZL Biologics, Inc. NHBís agreement with BZL is managed by Cornell University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.
Acknowledgements: The authors thank Lee Cohen Gould
for preparation of samples for electron microscopy and Lana Winter for
expert administrative assistance.